The different stages of evolution of man throughout history we will always remember him as a primitive and even more will the image of the prototype of man studied by Charles Darwin. But if you look closely at our surroundings, we see with wonder how many thousands of years have passed for now what we are. We have transformed the world catering to our needs and desires. Questions arose at all times that the man attempted to answer his findings parallel is as civilized. We are not static field, we are always looking for "something" and this is because, unlike animals and other species, we possess a privileged organ is the heart of all our gears of thought, of our intelligence , we reason by the will and functionality, thanks to our brain. This body is trained from an early age and the child acquires a set of skills during their long passage through the school. These skills in turn lead to the attainment of skills that are strengthened within the University Senate, where they germinate discoveries and scientific development based on research. Only those have the possibility of formally educated, make continuous exercise in mental processes from a combination of systematic and planned in each of the educational levels and whether access to higher education, it not only allowed but also the achievement status of new capabilities. So, I wonder what happens to youth who can not enter the university? Is it fair that the University is only a few? Where are the principles of equity and justice need to coexist in a harmonious society? Consider necessary the analysis of these premises to address the issue objectively. That is why single out the points which in my opinion are important to maintain that the only way society can ensure that the capacities of all are fully developed, is by mass higher education. Therefore as this is a matter of social interest, we must exhaust all avenues to reach a conclusion more or less valid.
begin by indicating that a mass higher education is the ideal of everyone just, democratic and sensible, considering the university as an organized space where undoubtedly reached a higher culture than the one I had if you are not part it. Is at the university where men develop higher thinking activities, transforming and rearranging his mindset, at its own changes in an evolution of another level, then confront in their social practice. If the individual is educated, the society will be too because culture provides values \u200b\u200band behavior patterns that are reflected in social change, as the man to have a higher education will be able to interpret the problems of life, and therefore respond better to them. Then we can say that education is a social investment, it allows the development of human resources, who in turn are responsible for technological and economic development of the country, to boot. Culture strongly influences in mindset, aspirations and lifestyles of individuals. And where a man can achieve a better cultural level? Not the University weave a crib where lofty thoughts? Is it not here where they develop the full potential of man?. University is the top space based on reflection, the controversy, the search for truth and the inexhaustible supply of its members. Absolutely. It follows that if all persons without distinction of any access to higher education can develop their skills, not be limited, it will change your way of seeing the world, life, problems, and then society will benefit.
Moreover, if we value the fact that as a society have reached the concept of equity and justice, the eyes return to the past only to remember with sadness a period of history too long and marred by a series of events opposed to freedom and equality, I am referring to the Middle Ages, where knowledge and education were limited to schools that were in the monasteries and cathedrals that conditioned them a status and privileges granted by the civil power and the papacy, not being extended to ordinary people, that is only a few were illuminated by knowledge. This fact and others I do not intend to mention part of a dark past that would not be good to repeat and that currently the conditions in education have changed dramatically by the evolution of society itself, by the thought of men and the rights achieved. Here we must recognize that each era has a special need for the university of today can not be solely to contribute to the enrichment of society through its democratic and participatory educational work. The University has to open its doors without hesitation at all to meet the challenge to grow culturally. Some would say that justice is never reached or that equity is incompatible with justice, but the fact is that it is our duty to act and think progresistamente in the context of social needs world. Man can not remain relegated to the culture, the man must prepare to meet the requirements of this society, man can be born every day and can not be impoverished by looking through the glass of life, how their peers develop, evolve, produce, change, are enriched to higher education. The university is a second mother to individuals and a mother can not walk away from their children or prefer some at the expense of others because it has consequences which are reflected in society irretrievably, for example in attitudes violent and frustrated youth, social malcontents, the criminals, suicides, gang members social parasites, which are there to poison or destroy in some way to their community because they were not part of, simply because there was no place for them in this system, which is sometimes depicted as a jungle where the strongest survives on weak. Rousseau said "all men are born free and equal by nature and the natural man is born good but must deal with a corrupt society," and is just a corrupt society which I believe, help to form when we deny a young the possibility of pursuing higher education, to grow as a person, if achieved as a professional, to join the working world, to be competitive and capable. And then, what we then wait for them? Not only more poverty but the collective frustration that paralyzes the man and prevent him from being able to give an idea, to create or propose solutions. Do not forget that in our country the social differences are very marked, possibly because the most disadvantaged groups among its members always have people full of complex and limitations of any kind to demonstrate and make a mark on the social scale, since in many cases can not even access to basic education, let alone higher education.
A different perspective of viewing this problem is to believe that if the university massification of education quality decreases. Supporters of this view have been isolated the social perspective because they have not thought about the consequences it brings to the company that few have access to university education. Insurance will almost exquisite education for them, have enhanced the possibility of professional, personal and culturally, but and what about those not in the system? Will they use a new generation of oppressed people, passive, or dangerous?. Because the exclusion not only brings rejection, resentment, poverty and frustration but also a widespread dismay and social impairment scale, for the children of the children receive that inheritance and entered a vicious circle, or we return to alienating at some time past.
On the other hand we argue that if all entering college, there is also a crowded group of young people with different levels of learning and this will be a problem, but I wonder how a problem for whom, it is logical that there are those who are prepared to carry out all complex educational process at the top level and also on the road who fail to meet required levels or simply do not fit. This basis of differences in levels of learning can not be a condition to access the top level because if we do not allow the individual has the experience we are deprived of their status as free human beings and also what we are abusing to this marginalization, saying without words "you're different", "you are worth less", "you can not" for you was not college. " Alternatively a selective attitude, could rescue the thought of Plato, who argued that the real man would be one that got linked to the ideas through knowledge and intellectual act. Then allow the massification of higher education also helps to meet the need of the individual self and emotional stability. Many times we have not witnessed distressed young people not achieving their college, and in this sense is compounded by the attitude of despair of the family who feels disappointed by the son who does not enter. In fact, I think the entrance exams to universities should not be because they are a closed door to the boys of lower social strata, who come from homes malnourished, mostly with economic constraints and public schools. We must banish from our minds the idea closed, selective and even selfish to think that college is right for a few. Here the state has a fundamental role to ensure not only that everyone has the right to education quality university but also to provide the mechanisms behind the student during their time at university through financial aid or basic work experience.
Finally, I would say that if everything that man invented, over time, the theories, scientific and technological advances, are signs of culture, evidence of his thought, the manifestation of its evolution from primitive to civilized, and these changes have been the product of education at different levels without a doubt, then it's worthwhile just to acknowledge the influence exerted by transforming higher education in man and therefore in society and that from of university research, discover, propose and transforms the environment. Then let all individuals without distinction, have access to higher education to develop their skills in the common good and proper and consequently achieve a better quality of life. Defend this idea, because only then will we have a new society. Education should be a public good and national treasure, lest we forget
Liz Bojorquez begin by indicating that a mass higher education is the ideal of everyone just, democratic and sensible, considering the university as an organized space where undoubtedly reached a higher culture than the one I had if you are not part it. Is at the university where men develop higher thinking activities, transforming and rearranging his mindset, at its own changes in an evolution of another level, then confront in their social practice. If the individual is educated, the society will be too because culture provides values \u200b\u200band behavior patterns that are reflected in social change, as the man to have a higher education will be able to interpret the problems of life, and therefore respond better to them. Then we can say that education is a social investment, it allows the development of human resources, who in turn are responsible for technological and economic development of the country, to boot. Culture strongly influences in mindset, aspirations and lifestyles of individuals. And where a man can achieve a better cultural level? Not the University weave a crib where lofty thoughts? Is it not here where they develop the full potential of man?. University is the top space based on reflection, the controversy, the search for truth and the inexhaustible supply of its members. Absolutely. It follows that if all persons without distinction of any access to higher education can develop their skills, not be limited, it will change your way of seeing the world, life, problems, and then society will benefit.
Moreover, if we value the fact that as a society have reached the concept of equity and justice, the eyes return to the past only to remember with sadness a period of history too long and marred by a series of events opposed to freedom and equality, I am referring to the Middle Ages, where knowledge and education were limited to schools that were in the monasteries and cathedrals that conditioned them a status and privileges granted by the civil power and the papacy, not being extended to ordinary people, that is only a few were illuminated by knowledge. This fact and others I do not intend to mention part of a dark past that would not be good to repeat and that currently the conditions in education have changed dramatically by the evolution of society itself, by the thought of men and the rights achieved. Here we must recognize that each era has a special need for the university of today can not be solely to contribute to the enrichment of society through its democratic and participatory educational work. The University has to open its doors without hesitation at all to meet the challenge to grow culturally. Some would say that justice is never reached or that equity is incompatible with justice, but the fact is that it is our duty to act and think progresistamente in the context of social needs world. Man can not remain relegated to the culture, the man must prepare to meet the requirements of this society, man can be born every day and can not be impoverished by looking through the glass of life, how their peers develop, evolve, produce, change, are enriched to higher education. The university is a second mother to individuals and a mother can not walk away from their children or prefer some at the expense of others because it has consequences which are reflected in society irretrievably, for example in attitudes violent and frustrated youth, social malcontents, the criminals, suicides, gang members social parasites, which are there to poison or destroy in some way to their community because they were not part of, simply because there was no place for them in this system, which is sometimes depicted as a jungle where the strongest survives on weak. Rousseau said "all men are born free and equal by nature and the natural man is born good but must deal with a corrupt society," and is just a corrupt society which I believe, help to form when we deny a young the possibility of pursuing higher education, to grow as a person, if achieved as a professional, to join the working world, to be competitive and capable. And then, what we then wait for them? Not only more poverty but the collective frustration that paralyzes the man and prevent him from being able to give an idea, to create or propose solutions. Do not forget that in our country the social differences are very marked, possibly because the most disadvantaged groups among its members always have people full of complex and limitations of any kind to demonstrate and make a mark on the social scale, since in many cases can not even access to basic education, let alone higher education.
A different perspective of viewing this problem is to believe that if the university massification of education quality decreases. Supporters of this view have been isolated the social perspective because they have not thought about the consequences it brings to the company that few have access to university education. Insurance will almost exquisite education for them, have enhanced the possibility of professional, personal and culturally, but and what about those not in the system? Will they use a new generation of oppressed people, passive, or dangerous?. Because the exclusion not only brings rejection, resentment, poverty and frustration but also a widespread dismay and social impairment scale, for the children of the children receive that inheritance and entered a vicious circle, or we return to alienating at some time past.
On the other hand we argue that if all entering college, there is also a crowded group of young people with different levels of learning and this will be a problem, but I wonder how a problem for whom, it is logical that there are those who are prepared to carry out all complex educational process at the top level and also on the road who fail to meet required levels or simply do not fit. This basis of differences in levels of learning can not be a condition to access the top level because if we do not allow the individual has the experience we are deprived of their status as free human beings and also what we are abusing to this marginalization, saying without words "you're different", "you are worth less", "you can not" for you was not college. " Alternatively a selective attitude, could rescue the thought of Plato, who argued that the real man would be one that got linked to the ideas through knowledge and intellectual act. Then allow the massification of higher education also helps to meet the need of the individual self and emotional stability. Many times we have not witnessed distressed young people not achieving their college, and in this sense is compounded by the attitude of despair of the family who feels disappointed by the son who does not enter. In fact, I think the entrance exams to universities should not be because they are a closed door to the boys of lower social strata, who come from homes malnourished, mostly with economic constraints and public schools. We must banish from our minds the idea closed, selective and even selfish to think that college is right for a few. Here the state has a fundamental role to ensure not only that everyone has the right to education quality university but also to provide the mechanisms behind the student during their time at university through financial aid or basic work experience.
Finally, I would say that if everything that man invented, over time, the theories, scientific and technological advances, are signs of culture, evidence of his thought, the manifestation of its evolution from primitive to civilized, and these changes have been the product of education at different levels without a doubt, then it's worthwhile just to acknowledge the influence exerted by transforming higher education in man and therefore in society and that from of university research, discover, propose and transforms the environment. Then let all individuals without distinction, have access to higher education to develop their skills in the common good and proper and consequently achieve a better quality of life. Defend this idea, because only then will we have a new society. Education should be a public good and national treasure, lest we forget
Soledad Meneses
0 comments:
Post a Comment